Author Archive

Attached is a copy of the letter CAMR just sent to President Obama urging him to act quickly and issue an Executive Order that lifts the federal restrictions on funding for embryonic stem cell research.

To send email messages to the White House go to the website www.whitehouse.gov and select the “contact us” tab in the top right corner. Fill out the email form to send a message.

Call the White House comment line at: 202-456-1111

MESSAGE to CUT and PASTE:

I ask you to immediately issue an Executive Order to reverse the federal restriction on funding for human embryonic stem cell research.

Progress has been stalled long enough. The 100 million patients who suffer from cancer, Alzheimer’s, diabetes, Parkinson’s, spinal cord injuries, heart disease, ALS, and others diseases look to you to allow embryonic stem cell research to move forward.

Research cannot wait for legislation. An Executive Order from you today could offer hope for so many.

Coming Soon!

Coming Soon!

Coming Soon!

Coming Soon!

Since the era of Galileo there has been a perceived conflict between religion, politics and science. There is debate in the religious community because no single voice can claim to represent all of America’s religious faithful on the subject. The Accidental Advocate film does not pretend to have a solution, but seeks to inform without hype and propaganda. To understand the religious arguments regarding ethical and moral standards, we convened a roundtable: a Catholic priest, imam, Orthodox rabbi and Episcopal priest. A starting place for wider discussions about making the world a better place, our religious roundtable offers a lens into the differences and commonalties between religions.

Religious Groups’ Official Positions on Stem Cell Research

July 17, 2008  |  Go to original article at Pewforum.org

American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A.

The group has no explicit policy on the issue; rather it states that “one must be guided by one’s own relationship with God and Scripture.”

• David Maraniss, “Editorial: Everything is Relative.” Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, August 26, 2001.
• Correspondence with representative from the American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A.

Buddhism

Though Buddhist teachings do not directly address the issue, there are two main tenets – the prohibition against harming or destroying others (ahimsa), and the pursuit of knowledge (prajña) and compassion (karua) – that divide Buddhist scholars and communities. Some Buddhists argue that stem cell research is in accordance with the Buddhist tenet of seeking knowledge and ending human suffering, while others argue that it is a violation of the notion of not harming others.

• ABC Science, “Buddhism at one with stem cell research”
• Damien Keown, “‘No Harm’ Applies to Stem Cell Embryos: One Buddhist’s View” (reprinted by Beliefnet.com)
• Somparn Promta, Philosophy Department and Center for Buddhist Studies, Chulalongkorn University, “Human Cloning and Embryonic Stem Cell Research: A View from Theravada Buddhist Morality”

Catholicism

In accordance with their anti-abortion stance, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops supports adult stem cell research but opposes embryonic stem cell research since it creates or destroys human embryos.

• U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, “Catholic Support for Ethically Acceptable Stem Cell Research”

Episcopal Church

In 2004, the church’s governing body, the General Convention, declared itself in favor of stem cell research as long as the embryos used would have been destroyed otherwise, the embryos were not created solely for research purposes and the embryos were not bought or sold.

• The Archives of the Episcopal Church, The Acts of Convention 1976-2006, “Support Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research“

Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

The ELCA does not have an official position on the issue. In 2005, the Churchwide Assembly, the governing body of the church, created a task force to study the issues of genetics and biotechnology and to present a report in 2011.

• Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, “A Social Statement on Genetics”

Hinduism

Though Hinduism believes that life begins at conception, the religion has no official position on stem cell research.

• HinduismToday.com, October/November/Decemeber 2004, “On Stem Cell Research“
• The New York Times, “How India Reconciles Hindu Values and Biotech”

Islam

There is no explicit Islamic ruling on the issue of stem cell research. While some Muslim leaders allow for stem cell research on the ground that, according to Islam, an embryo in the early stage of pregnancy does not have a soul, others argue that the termination of an embryo at any stage of pregnancy is morally impermissible.

• Islam 101: “An Islamic Perspective on Stem Cells Research”
• The Christian Science Monitor, “Stem-Cell Science Stirs Debate in Muslim World, Too”

Judaism

All major Jewish denominations – including the Reform, Conservative, Orthodox and Reconstructionist movements – support both embryonic and adult stem cell research as long as it is for medical or therapeutic purposes.

• Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, “Stem Cell Research, Position of the Reform Jewish Movement”
• United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, “Stem Cell Research and Education (2003)”
• Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association, “Resolution on Educational and Political Support for Stem Cell Research”
• Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations Welcomes U.S. House Passage of Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act (2005)

Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod

In 2005, the group reaffirmed its opposition to embryonic stem cell research, advocating instead for adult stem cell research.

• Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, “Christian Faith and Human Beginnings: Christian Care and Pre-implementation Human Life”

Mormonism

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has not issued a statement on the issue of stem cell research.

• The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Newsroom, Public Issues: “Embryonic Stem-cell Research”

National Association of Evangelicals

In 2005, the National Association of Evangelicals issued a statement voicing its opposition to stem cell research.

• National Association of Evangelicals, “Bioethics & Stem Cell Research”

National Council of Churches

After an evaluation in 2006 of the debate surrounding stem cell research, the National Council of Churches’ Human Biotechnologies Policy Development Committee adopted a position stating that “as a result of a lack of clear consensus [among ethicists, academia and scientists], the National Council of Churches neither endorses nor condemns experimentation on human embryos.”

• National Council of Churches, “Fearfully and Wonderfully Made: A Policy on Human Biotechnologies”

Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)

In 2004, the Presbyterian Church’s governing body, the General Assembly, reaffirmed its position in favor of stem cell research that is intended to “[restore health] to those suffering from serious illness.”

• Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), The Washington Office, “Next Steps: Federal Funding for Stem Cell Research”

Southern Baptist Convention

In 1999, the Southern Baptist Convention reaffirmed its “opposition to the destruction of human embryos … [and] support for the development of alternative treatments which do not require human embryos to be killed.”

• Southern Baptist Convention, “Resolution On Human Embryonic and Stem Cell Research”

Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations

In 2006, the association’s policymaking body, the General Assembly, stated its support for stem cell research as long as the research is for medical therapies and not the reproductive cloning of humans.

• Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations, Social Justice Statements, “Pass the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act”

United Church of Christ

In 2001, the United Church of Christ ruled in favor of research on embryonic stem cells that would otherwise be discarded from in vitro fertilization.

• United Church of Christ, Resolutions, “Support for Federally Funded Research on Embryonic Stem Cells”

United Methodist Church

In 2004, the United Methodist Church asserted its support for therapeutic cloning in which spare embryonic stem cells resulting from in vitro fertilization are used. The church also maintained its opposition to the use or creation of embryonic stem cells solely for the purpose of research.

• United Methodist Church, Archives, “Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research”

« Back to the report

January 3, 2009 | By by Carl Hulse for the New York Times

WASHINGTON — Thwarted by President Bush in their efforts to expand federal spending on embryonic stem cell research, Democrats are now debating whether to overturn federal restrictions through executive order or by legislation when they assume full control of the government this month.

Both President-elect Barack Obama and Democratic Congressional leaders have made repealing Bush administration restrictions announced in 2001 a top priority. But they have yet to determine if Mr. Obama should quickly put his stamp on the issue by way of presidential directive, or if Congress should write a permanent policy into statute.

The debate is not academic. Democrats who oppose abortion say such a legislative fight holds the potential to get the year off to a difficult beginning, even though the outcome is certain given solid majorities in both the House and the Senate for expanded embryonic stem cell research.

read full article

by Sharon Begley for Newsweek |  Posted Monday, November 03, 2008 1:00 PM

The debate over research on embryonic stem cells can seem pretty abstract, so if you want to get a real feel for the effect of President Bush’s ban on the use of federal money for studies of new stem-cell lines see if you can catch a screening of a documentary called The Accidental Advocate. It was produced and directed by Jessica Gerstle, who was an Emmy Award-winning journalist at Dateline NBC for 12 years and who is—more relevantly—the daughter of Dr. Claude Gerstle, an ophthalmologist who was paralyzed from the neck down after a bicycle accident that, as he says wonderingly in the film, left him with nary a broken bone nor a scratch on his helmet. “Merely” a quadriplegic.

The film chronicles Dr. Gerstle’s wheelchair-bound odyssey to learn whether stem cell research offers him any hope of walking again and, more poignantly, his encounters with politicians who believe it is more ethical to flush unwanted embryos (from IVF clinics) down the sink rather than allow scientists to isolate stem cells from these balls of cells and use them to produce lines of cells that hold therapeutic promise. It’s fascinating, in a cringe-inducing sort of way, to see Dr. Gerstle’s Senate-hallway encounter with Sen. Sam Brownback, who believes that embracing “the culture of life” requires unwanted IVF embryos to be discarded rather than used to help people such as Dr. Gerstle, is priceless. (Just to be clear, while there have been several score “snowflake babies” born from frozen embryos “adopted” by couples after the biological parents no longer needed them, an estimated 20,000 frozen embryos are discarded every year.)

In contrast, Sen. Orin Hatch, the Utah Republican who broke with his party and president to support allowing federal dollars to be used for research on frozen IVF embryos that are headed for the waste bin, graciously sits down with Dr. Gerstle to offer his support.

When Dr. Gerstle is not an advocate—and you marvel at his stamina and dedication, and his willingness to travel the country when he can barely raise himself from his wheelchair to get into an airplane seat—he is a quadriplegic. The film shows his agonizing physical therapy, as he tries to take a few steps using a walker, and his painstaking efforts to do something as simple as lift a sandwich to his lips. As his wife reminds us, it’s the little things—like not being able to brush your own teeth—that can be so wearing on paralyzed patients. As for Dr. Gerstle, he says that what he wants more than anything is to be able to once again hug his wife of 38 years.

This Thursday, Nov. 6, those of you in Salt Lake City can see it at Leonardo, 209 East 500 South, at 7 p.m. The University of Utah geneticist Mario Capecchi will speak.. The film was shown at both the Republican and Democratic nominating conventions this summer, and you can Google the film for other screenings.

go to original article